Bush puts children at risk?
Here's a curious thought:
When I watched the 2nd plane hit the WTC on Sept. 11, I thought to myself (and said to my wife), "This is it... WWIII. We're being attacked."
George Bush was at an elementary school when the planes hit. Wouldn't you think that the President of the United States of America, when our future was uncertain, and it appeared as though there may be more strikes, would be concerned about a.) his own safety, and b.) the safety of the hundreds of school children he was near?
His appearance at the school in Florida was public knowledge. What if, as a part of the attack on America, the President were a target? Is that far-fetched? Upon hearing of the second tower strike, shouldn't the Secret Service have whisked GW away quickly, when staying in place was obviously presenting a danger to those in and around the school?
No one seemed concerned that he might be a target. Seems Georgie and the rest of the crew were privvy to the plan and knew they were safe. Otherwise, putting all those innocent people in danger seems a pretty callous thing to do. Callous or corrupt? Pick the one you feel more comfortable with.
2 Comments:
If you think panicking and scaring a group of kindergarteners is the best way to keep them safe, then sure.
Moron.
Riiiiiight. Cause there's no way to usher your boy out of the school WITHOUT causing 'panic.' The "President" can't have some important business that isn't 'scary.'
No, you're right. Keeping him put, when our country's "under attack" and there is the possibility of an assassination attempt is smart thinkin'.
But shit, if 30,000 Iraqi civilians are just collateral damage, what's a few hundred kindergarteners?
You're a brilliant thinker, Pirate-boy. Go scrub the poop deck.
Post a Comment
<< Home